Previous Article Next Article

Mariam Al Eissa et al. JBC Genetics. 2021;4(2):70-75

Journal of Biochemical and Clinical Genetics

Genetic carrier screening for disorders included in newborn screening in the Saudi population

Mariam Al Eissa1,2,3, Taghrid Aloraini3,4, Lamia Alsubaie3,5, Abdulrahman Alswaid3,5, Wafaa Eyiad3,5, Fuad Al Mutairi3,5, Faroug Ababneh3,5, Majid Alfadhel3,5, Ahmed Alfares3,4,6*

Correspondence to: Ahmed Alfares

*Qassim University, Department of Pediatrics, Almulyda, Saudi Arabia.

Email: fars [at] qu.edu.sa

Full list of author information is available at the end of the article.

Received: 25 February 2021 | Accepted: 22 May 2021


ABSTRACT

Background:

Inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) are prevalent autosomal recessive disorders in Saudi Arabia. Socio-economic factors, such as consanguineous marriages, play a role in the high rate of diseases. The government of Saudi Arabia created a newborn screening program (NBS) for the most prevalent disorders to facilitate early intervention and the prevention of severe complications. The study aimed to determine the carried pathogenic allele of the diseases included in the NBS and the most frequently carried phenotype in the Saudi population.


Methods:

We performed targeted genetic screening for the genes associated with the IEM in the NBS. We used the results of the whole exome sequencing of 1,314 affected and unaffected individuals from 650 families. The results constitute the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center Genomic Database.


Results:

According to the data set, four diseases occurred most frequently in the Saudi population: adrenal hyperplasia, propionic acidemia, phenylketonuria, and maple syrup urine disease. In total, 12 pathogenic variants occurred frequently.


Conclusion:

This study generated an updated list of the most pathogenic variants in the Saudi population, based on the National Guard Hospital dataset. Additional research with larger data sets from the different regions will provide valuable information about the allele distribution in the Saudi population, creating a carrier screening program.


Keywords:

Carrier screening, variants, Saudi population, exome sequencing, common genetic variation.


Introduction

Consanguineous marriages (CM) is the preferred way of partnering in the Middle East and North Africa (MENA) region to assure the continuation of the marriage, strengthen the relationship, and social ties. The MENA region has the highest CM rate globally (1). Economic factors also play a role in CM as it reduces the cost of the marriage compared to marriage outside the family or clan (2). In Saudi Arabia, the estimates vary per region, but approximately 50% of the Saudi population are involved in a CM, of which 50% are married to a first-cousin (3). The social-economic and demographic factors have a significant effect on the partnering choice (1), which increases the rate of autosomal recessive (AR) genetic disorders (4-6). The mortality rate is 3.5% higher in first-cousin children than non-consanguineous children (1).

Due to CM, the Saudi population has the highest AR birth rate globally, with 40% of the founder mutations of the total mutation pool (7,8), 81% of the Mendelian phenotypes reported as AR, and 97% in a homozygous form (9,10). One of the most prevalent Mendelian monogenic phenotypes in Saudi Arabia is inborn errors of metabolism (IEM) (Table 1) (3). The genetic burden of recessive single-gene disorders can be reduced by changing marriage patterns, using screening programs (SP) and public health education (1,11). Hundreds of IEMs have been linked to a rare genetic variation found in the protein-coding regions, disrupting the function of enzymes known to process certain metabolites (12,13). The global prevalence varies per region. In Saudi Arabia, the frequency in the Eastern Province is 1 in 667, and in the Central Region, according to Alfadhel et al., one in 591 (12,14). SP introduce a number of advantages to prevent the most prevalent disorders in populations through early detection and preventing future complications (15,16).

The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia established a National transformation program in 2016 to fulfill Vision 2030, which included several programs to ensure healthcare transformation. Led by the Ministry of Health (MOH), programs were launched in healthcare to control and prevent diseases, including the newborn screening program (NBS) (17,18). The NBS focus on the IEM in Table 1, which supports early case detection (19). After years of implementation, there is a notable reduction in IEM, indicating that the program succeeded in raising awareness and afford the proposed partners an option to proceed with the marriage or not (20).

However, SP targeting cases are not appropriate to detect carriers, which is important for securing healthy progeny (21). Population carrier SP can deliver significant public health benefits for asymptomatic individuals or persons at risk of partnering with another carrier (22). Up until now, no SP is available in our region to detect the carrier status. Although the MOH proposes to expand the tests to more diseases, such a program will be used for case confirmation on a diagnostic level, not carrier detection. In this paper, we are estimating the carrier frequency of diseases included in the NBS.


Subjects and Methods

We perform targeted genetic screening for the gene list in Table 1 to identify the most frequently carried allele in the Saudi population. We used whole-exome sequencing, done for diagnostic purposes and informed consent for research use. The sequencing was performed in College of American Pathologists-accredited genetic laboratories in King Abdulaziz Medical City or a sequencing service. The results are stored in the King Abdullah International Medical Research Center (KAIMRC) Genomic Database (KGD) in variant calling files. The data have been recruited since 2014 up to date and realized as 650 families, with 1,314 affected and unaffected individuals (23). In total, 2,173,863 filtered variants, only 2,181 variants are classified as pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants, based on the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics scoring system (24) or previously observed in ClinVar (25). One member of each family was included to avoid bias. We eliminated autosomal dominant variants, including AR and X-linked variants. The pipeline used for the filtration comprised of a read depth of more than 15× and a minor allele frequency of less than 1% (Figure 1), using the local KGD database and the Saudi human genome project database (SHGP db), other multi-ethnic databases, the genome aggregation database (GenomAD) and dbSNP/1,000 (26,27). The approval for this study was obtained from the Institutional Research Board of KAIMRC, #RC19/315/R.


Results

For the gene list in Table 1, 12 pathogenic variants were identified. CAH (OMIM:201910) was the most frequently carried disorder in the Saudi population, based on the KGD (Table 2). The variant creates a stop-gain of function in chromosome 6 in 32008198, which changes cytosine to thiamin. The change was only observed in the KGD and not in the GenomAD or SHGP. Five variants were also found in the CYP21A2 gene previously reported in the Saudi population. A variant in chr13:100809551G>A, associated PPA (OMIM:606054), was found in six individuals in the KGD (0.46%) and the SHGP (0.24%) but not in the GenomAD. Four missense variants were found in the PAH gene, causing PKU (OMIM:261600), previously reported in the Saudi population. Finally, a pathogenic variant was reported previously in MSUD, also known as Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency (OMIM:246900). The incidence rate in the data was compared to AlFadhel et al. studying the Saudi population (Table 3).

Figure 1. Study summary.

Table 1. The diseases included in the Saudi neonatal SP.

Metabolite Disorder Abbreviations Gene/Locus
Aminoacidopathies Phenylketonuria PKU PAH
Argininosuccinate lyase deficiency ASL ASL
Maple syrup urine disease MSUD DBT, BCKDHB, BCKDHA, DLD
Citrullinaemia CIT ASS1
Organic acid disorders Propionic acidaemia PPA PCCB, PCCA
Methylmalonic acidaemia MMA MUT, C2orf25, MMAA, MMAB, MMACHC, PRDX1, CD320, LMBRD1, ACSF3, ABCD4, SUCLA2, HCFC
Glutaric acidaemia type-I GA-I GCDH
Isovaleric acidaemia IVA IVD
3-methylcrotonyl-CoA carboxylase deficiency (3-MCC) MCCC1
Fatty acid oxidation defect Medium-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency MCAD ACADM
Very long-chain acyl CoA dehydrogenase deficiency VLCAD ACADVL
Ketogenesis and ketolysis defects 3-hydroxy-3-Methylglutaryl-Co A lyase deficiency HMG HMGCL
Beta-ketothiolase deficiency BKT ACAT1
Carbohydrate disorder Galactosaemia GALT GALT
Endocrine disorders Congenital hypothyroidism CH DUOX2, TG, TPO, TSHR, TTF1, TTF2, PAX8, NKX2-5, GNAS, THRA, TSHB, IYD, SLC5A5
Congenital adrenal hyperplasia CAH CYP21A2
Vitamin responsive disorder Biotinidase deficiency BTD BTD

Discussion

The diseases in Table 1 are known as the most frequent IEM in the Saudi population. The SP, implemented for a number of years, supports prevention, and early intervention. Of the diseases included in the NBS program, the most frequently occurring allele causes adrenal hyperplasia. Due to the mode of inheritance in CAH as compound heterozygotes, it is normal to find a number of variants in the same gene (28-30). The most frequent variation in this gene has been observed in the SHGP. The variant in chromosome 6 position 32008198 C>T (c.955C > T), found in 24 individuals in the KGD, does not appear in the SHGP. Individuals with this variant usually have a duplication of the CYP21A2 gene, and they are normal with no phenotype if this changes c.955C > T on the duplicated allele (31). Although there are many pathogenic variants in this gene, CAH is an AR disease due to pathogenic homozygous or compound heterozygous variants. A single pathogenic variant does not cause the disease without other cis or trans compound heterozygous variants. While it is the most frequently carried disease, due to the increased number of pathogenic variants according to our data, it may not be the most prevalent IEM.

PPA is the second in line with an incidence of 1 per 12,500 births (32). According to Al-Hamed et al. (32), c.425 G>A is the most frequent variant causing PPA in the Saudi population, reported by AlFadhel et al. Another disease from the NBS disease list is PKU; the number of variants observed is shown in Table 2. PKU has been reported in different populations (33), though the allele distribution varies in populations. Finally, a variant has been found in the DLD gene associated with MSUD, although other studies with the Saudi population also indicate other genes (Table 1), with variations related to MSUD (34). As shown in Table 3, the incidence varied between the current study and AlFadhel et al. This is due to the sample size difference and AlFadhel et al. observed disease incidence. Still, in the current study, the incidence is calculated from the carrier frequencies.

Table 2. Most carried pathogenic variants of the diseases included in the Saudi SP data extracted from the KGD.

GENE Genomic coordinates c.DNA Amino acid Transcript Impact RS ID Variant count KGD_MAF GenomAD SHGP Disease
CYP21A2 chr6:32008198C>Ta c.955C>T p.Gln319Ter NM_000500.9 stop gained rs7755898 24 1.85% NA NA Adrenal hyperplasia
chr6:32008870C>T c.1447C>T p.Pro483Ser NM_000500.9 missense variant rs776989258 11 0.85% 0.0524% 1.11%
chr6:32007893A>G c.850A>G p.Met284Val NM_000500.9 missense variant rs770199817 9 0.69% 0.0043% 0.51%
chr6:32007887G>T c.844G>T p.Val282Leu NM_000500.9 missense variant rs6471 8 0.62% 0.5515% 0.24%
chr6:32006858C>G c.293-13C>G NA NM_000500.9 5 prime UTR variant rs6467 3 0.23% 0.2205% 0.24%
chr6:32008783C>T c.1360C>T p.Pro454Ser NM_000500.9 missense variant rs6445 1 0.08% 0.4530% 0.06%
PCCA chr13:100809551G>A c.425G>A p.Gly142Asp NM_000282.4 5 prime UTR variant missense variant rs796052019 6 0.46% NA 0.24% Propionic acidemia
PAH chr12:103245479C>A c.898G>T p.Ala300Ser NM_000277.3 missense variant rs5030853 4 0.31% 0.0538% 0.09% Phenylketonuria
chr12:103237484G>A c.1139C>T p.Thr380Met NM_000277.3 missense variant rs62642937 2 0.15% 0.0418% 0.38%
chr12:103260377C>T c.506G>A p.Arg169His NM_000277.3 missense variant rs199475679 1 0.08% 0.0273% 0.06%
chr12:103288554G>T c.311C>A p.Ala104Asp NM_000277.3 missense variant rs62642929 1 0.08% 0.0052% NA
DLD chr7:107555951G>T c.685G>T p.Gly229Cys NM_000108.5 missense variant rs121964990 3 0.23% 0.0308% 0.15% Dihydrolipoamide dehydrogenase deficiency

*Variant found in chr6:32008198C>T,c.550C>T, p.Gln184Ter causing a stop gained found in 24 in the database never been reported and known to be associated with certain haplotype not necessarily disease-related.

Table 3. Comparing carrier frequency in two studies, AlFadhel et al. and KGD, excluding adrenal hyperplasia (not in AlFadhel et al.) and the numbers of variants involved in the different haplotypes.

AlFadhel et al. KGD
Disease Numbers of carriers Total screened Incidence Numbers of carriers Total screened Carriers Incidence
Propionic acidemia 9 110,601 1:12,289 6 680 113.3 1:51,347.56
Phenylketonuria 5 110,601 1:22,120 8 680 85 1:28,900
Maple syrup urine disease 5 110,601 1:22,120 3 680 226.7 1:205,571.56

Conclusion

In this study, we determined the most frequently carried alleles in the Saudi population. The allele distribution of the diseases screened in the NBS improves understanding of the most frequent allele for each disease and the distribution in families or regions. Diseases, such as CAH with compound heterozygous variations increasing the carrier status, will support other programs, including pre-marital screening or carrier screening, to facilitate detection before pregnancy. The prevalence of these alleles facilitates the design of regional carrier SP. Unfortunately, the data only presents the KGD population. There is an urgent requirement to determine the diseases or allele distributions for the different regions and the need for larger sample size for a more accurate estimation of the carrier frequencies. Additional research will add value in understanding the allele distribution in the Saudi population.


Acknowledgment

The authors are thankful to the patients and their family who participated in this study.


Author contribution

MAI, and AA designed the study, interpreted the clinical data, and wrote the article. MAI, TA, and LA collected samples, genotyped the cases and helped in statistical analysis. AA, WE, FAM, FA, and MA, contributed in samples collection, clinical correlation and manuscript revision. All authors have read and approved the final manuscripts.


Funding

None.


Declaration of conflicting interests

The authors of this article have no affiliations with or involvement in any organization or entity with any financial interest or non-financial interest in the subject matter or materials discussed in this manuscript.


Ethical approval

Ethical approval was granted by the Institutional Research Board of KAIMRC via reference number #RC19/315/R dated 18/12/2019.


Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from the patients.


Author details

Mariam Al Eissa1,2,3, Taghrid Aloraini3,4, Lamia Alsubaie3,5, Abdulrahman Alswaid3,5, Wafaa Eyiad3,5, Fuad Al Mutairi3,5, Faroug Ababneh3,5, Majid Alfadhel3,5, Ahmed Alfares3,4,6

  1. Department of Molecular Genetics, Public Health Laboratory, Public Health Authority, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  2. College of Medicine, Alfaisal University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  3. King Abdullah International Medical Research Center, King Saud bin Abdulaziz University for Health Sciences, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  4. Division of Translational Pathology, Department of Laboratory Medicine, King Abdulaziz Medical City, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  5. Department of Genetics and Precision Medicine (GPM), King Abdullah Specialized Children Hospital, King Abdulaziz Medical City, MNGHA, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia
  6. Department of Pediatrics, College of Medicine, Qassim University, Qassim, Saudi Arabia

References

  1. Bittles AH, Black ML. Consanguinity, human evolution, and complex diseases. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(Suppl 1):1779–86. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0906079106
  2. Anwar S, Mourosi JT, Arafat Y, Hosen MJ. Genetic and reproductive consequences of consanguineous marriage in Bangladesh. PLoS One. 2020;15(11): e0241610. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0241610
  3. Alfares A, Alkuraya F. An overview of Mendelian disorders in Saudi Arabia, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia; 2016. pp 26–37.
  4. El Mouzan MI, Al Salloum AA, Al Herbish AS, Qurachi MM, Al Omar AA. Consanguinity and major genetic disorders in Saudi children: a community-based cross- sectional study. Ann Saudi Med . 2008;28(3):169–73.
  5. Al-Owain M, Al-Zaidan H, Al-Hassnan Z. Map of autosomal recessive genetic disorders in Saudi Arabia: concepts and future directions. Am J Med Genet A. 2012;158A(10):2629–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/ajmg.a.35551
  6. Bittles AH. A community genetics perspective on consanguineous marriage. Community Genet. 2008;11(6):324–30. https://doi.org/10.1159/000133304
  7. Monies D, Abouelhoda M, Assoum M, Moghrabi N, Rafiullah R, Almontashiri N, et al. Lessons learned from large-scale, first-tier clinical exome sequencing in a highly consanguineous population. Am J Hum Genet. 2019;104(6):1182–201. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajhg.2019.04.011
  8. Alkuraya FS. Genetics and genomic medicine in Saudi Arabia. Mol Genet Genomic Med. 2014;2(5):369–78. https://doi.org/10.1002/mgg3.97
  9. Alfares A, Alfadhel M, Wani T, Alsahli S, Alluhaydan I, Al Mutairi F, et al. A multicenter clinical exome study in unselected cohorts from a consanguineous population of Saudi Arabia demonstrated a high diagnostic yield. Mol Genet Metab [Internet]. 2017;121(2):91–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgme.2017.04.002
  10. Monies D, Abouelhoda M, Alsayed M, Alhassnan Z, Alotaibi M, Kayyali H, et al. The landscape of genetic diseases in Saudi Arabia based on the first 1000 diagnostic panels and exomes. Hum Genet. 2017;136(8):921–39. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00439-017-1821-8
  11. Al-Harbi KM. The need for development of medical genetics and genomics curriculum for medical schools in Saudi Arabia. Int J Innovative Res Med Sci [Internet]. 2019;4:175–7. Available from: https://www.moh.gov.sa/en/HealthAwareness/EducationalContent/PublicHealth/Pages/PremaritalScreening.aspx https://doi.org/10.23958/ijirms/vol04-i03/587
  12. Alfadhel M, Benmeakel M, Hossain MA, Al Mutairi F, Al Othaim A, Alfares AA, et al. Thirteen year retrospective review of the spectrum of inborn errors of metabolism presenting in a tertiary center in Saudi Arabia. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2016;11(1):126. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13023-016-0510-3
  13. Lanpher B, Brunetti-Pierri N, Lee B. Inborn errors of metabolism: the flux from Mendelian to complex diseases. Nat Rev Genet. 2006;7(6):449–60. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg1880
  14. Moammar H, Cheriyan G, Mathew R, Al-Sannaa N. Incidence and patterns of inborn errors of metabolism in the eastern province of Saudi Arabia, 1983–2008. Ann Saudi Med. 2010;30(4):271–7. https://doi.org/10.4103/0256-4947.65254
  15. World Health Organisation. Screening programmes: a short guide [Internet]. Copenhagen Ø, Denmark: WHO Regional Office for Europe; 2020. pp 1–70. Available from: https://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/handle/10665/330829/9789289054782-eng.pdf
  16. Andermann A, Blancquaert I, Beauchamp S, Déry V. Public health classics. Revisiting Wilson and Jungner in the genomic age : a review of screening criteria over the past 40 years. Bull World Health Organ. 2008;86(4):317–9. https://doi.org/10.2471/BLT.07.050112
  17. Ministry of Health. National transformation program 2020. Vision 2030.Saudi Arabia; 2016. Available from: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/v2030/vrps/ntp/
  18. Gosadi IM. National screening programs in Saudi Arabia: overview, outcomes, and effectiveness. J Infect Public Health. 2019;12(5):608–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.06.001
  19. Alfadhel M, Al Othaim A, Al Saif S, Al Mutairi F, Alsayed M, Rahbeeni Z, et al. Expanded newborn screening program in Saudi Arabia: incidence of screened disorders. J Paediatr Child Health. 2017;53(6):585–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/jpc.13469
  20. Alsaeed ES, Farhat GN, Assiri AM, Memish Z, Ahmed EM, Saeedi MY, et al. Distribution of hemoglobinopathy disorders in Saudi Arabia based on data from the premarital screening and genetic counseling program, 2011–2015. J Epidemiol Glob Health. 2018;7(Suppl 1):S41–7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jegh.2017.12.001
  21. Westemeyer M, Saucier J, Wallace J, Prins SA, Shetty A, Malhotra M, et al. Clinical experience with carrier screening in a general population: support for a comprehensive pan-ethnic approach. Genet Med [Internet]. 2020;22(8):1320–8. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41436-020-0807-4
  22. Bener A, Al-Mulla M, Clarke A. Premarital screening and genetic counseling program: studies from an endogamous population. Int J Appl Basic Med Res. 2019;9(1):20–6.
  23. Alfares A, Alsubaie L, Aloraini T, Alaskar A, Althagafi A, Alahmad A, et al. What is the right sequencing approach? Solo VS extended family analysis in consanguineous populations. BMC Med Genomics. 2020;13(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12920-020-00743-8
  24. Richards S, Aziz N, Bale S, Bick D, Das S, Gastier-Foster J, et al. Standards and guidelines for the interpretation of sequence variants: a joint consensus recommendation of the American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics and the Association for Molecular Pathology. Genet Med. 2015;17(5):405–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/gim.2015.30
  25. Landrum MJ, Lee JM, Benson M, Brown GR, Chao C, Chitipiralla S, et al. ClinVar: improving access to variant interpretations and supporting evidence. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D1062–7. https://doi.org/10.1093/nar/gkx1153
  26. Bhagwat M. Searching NCBI’s dbSNP database. Curr Protoc Bioinformatics. 2010;32(1):1–19. https://doi.org/10.1002/0471250953.bi0119s32
  27. Clemens DJ, Lentino AR, Kapplinger JD, Ye D, Zhou W, Tester DJ, et al. Using the genome aggregation database, computational pathogenicity prediction tools, and patch clamp heterologous expression studies to demote previously published long QT syndrome type 1 mutations from pathogenic to benign. Hear Rhythm. 2018;15(4):555–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2017.11.032
  28. Hannah-Shmouni F, Chen W, Merke DP. Genetics of congenital adrenal hyperplasia. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2017;46(2):435–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecl.2017.01.008
  29. Stikkelbroeck NMML, Hoefsloot LH, de Wijs IJ, Otten BJ, Hermus AR, Sistermans EA, et al. CYP21 gene mutation analysis in 198 patients with 21- hydroxylase deficiency in The Netherlands : six novel mutations and a specific cluster of four mutations. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2003;88(8):3852–9. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2002-021681
  30. Doleschall M, Luczay A, Koncz K, Hadzsiev K, Erhardt É, Szilágyi Á, et al. A unique haplotype of RCCX copy number variation : from the clinics of congenital adrenal hyperplasia to evolutionary genetics. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017;(3):702–10. https://doi.org/10.1038/ejhg.2017.38
  31. Dubey S, Tardy V, Chowdhury MR, Gupta N, Jain V, Deka D, et al. Prenatal diagnosis of steroid 21-hydroxylase-deficient congenital adrenal hyperplasia : experience from a tertiary care centre in India. Indian J Med Res. 2017;145(2):194–202.
  32. Al-Hamed MH, Imtiaz F, Al-Hassnan Z, Al-Owain M, Al-Zaidan H, Alamoudi MS, et al. Spectrum of mutations underlying propionic acidemia and further insight into a genotype-phenotype correlation for the common mutation in Saudi Arabia. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2019;18:22–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2018.12.004
  33. Kreile M, Lubina O, Ozola-Zalite I, Lugovska R, Pronina N, Sterna O, et al. Phenylketonuria in the Latvian population: molecular basis, phenylalanine levels, and patient compliance. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2020;25:100671. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2020.100671
  34. Imtiaz F, Al-Mostafa A, Allam R, Ramzan K, Al-Tassan N, Tahir AI, et al. Twenty novel mutations in BCKDHA, BCKDHB and DBT genes in a cohort of 52 Saudi Arabian patients with maple syrup urine disease. Mol Genet Metab Rep. 2017;11:17–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ymgmr.2017.03.006